Incident Response and Recovery in the Extended Enterprise: Practical guidance for TPRM practitioners

Most third party incidents come to light before the third party officially reports them. Usually, the first sign is indirect; a service slows down, a business owner notices access problems, a customer-facing team spots a disruption, or an alert goes off with little detail. By the time the third party confirms the issue, internal teams are already asking key questions: what is affected, what data is involved, who manages the relationship, what does the third party need to do under contract, and what options are available if service is not restored quickly. 

Here, the extended enterprise means all the outside organizations that help the business run, including both third parties and the fourth parties they depend on. This matters during incident response because the impact and the root cause are often in different places. For example, a fourth party might cause a disruption, but the response still goes through the third party covering contracts, communication, evidence requests, and recovery promises. Third Party Risk Management (TPRM) teams need to make this chain clear and actionable during an incident. 

Incident response and recovery in the extended enterprise are just as much coordination issues as technical ones. Security teams focus on containment and investigation. Privacy and Legal teams assess notification and contractual obligations. Business owners need to keep operations running and manage third party accountability. Continuity teams need recovery assumptions and workaround options. Procurement needs contract visibility and leverage. TPRM sits in the middle, translating third party relationships into a decision-ready context, so the response does not stall while teams reconstruct basic information. 

This blog shares practical ways TPRM practitioners can help with incident response and recovery when third party incidents happen across the extended enterprise. The focus is on tools and processes that work during real incidents, not just on perfect documentation. The aim is to cut down the time spent on getting oriented, escalating issues, and tracking down information, so teams can act faster on impact, third party accountability, and recovery. 

Maintain third party records for use during an incident. 

When a third party problem comes up, the first challenge is getting oriented. Teams need to know who manages the third party, what the third party does, and how much disruption the business can handle. 

TPRM programs should ensure third party records include: 

• A clearly identified business owner with authority to engage the third party. 

• The services provided and systems involved. 

• The types of data accessed or processed. 

• Whether the service supports customer-facing, revenue-generating, or regulated activity. 

If teams have to gather this information after an incident begins, the response slows down and coordination suffers. 

Practitioner takeaway: Ensure third party inventories are immediately usable during real incidents, not just for onboarding or annual reviews, so teams can quickly access orienting information. 

Use risk tiering and operational criticality to define response expectations. 

Risk tiering sets the basic level of oversight. Operational criticality shows if a problem with this third party would have an immediate effect on the business. 

Each third party should have: 

• An inherent risk tier 

• An operational criticality designation, critical or not critical 

Together, these factors should guide: 

• Notification and response timelines 

• Evidence and information requests during incidents 

• Leadership escalation and continuity involvement 

For third parties that are critical to operations, these expectations should be agreed on and documented ahead of time. This includes clear escalation paths and recovery plans the business depends on. 

Practitioner takeaway: Use risk tiering to set oversight expectations. Use operational criticality to determine how quickly a third party issue becomes a business-impact decision. 

Treat fourth-party involvement as a normal part of the response. 

Many third party incidents involve a fourth party, like a hosting provider, cloud platform, or specialized subcontractor. During a response, teams need to know if a fourth party is part of the delivery chain and if that changes recovery options. 

Programs tend to be more effective when they: 

• Require third parties to disclose material fourth parties that affect service delivery or data exposure. 

• Apply this requirement primarily to operationally critical third parties. 

• Require notification when material fourth parties change. 

This helps teams quickly assess impact and recovery limits, avoiding the slow process of rebuilding the supply chain during an active incident. 

Practitioner takeaway: Focus fourth party visibility on the most important dependencies related to service delivery and data exposure for effective response. 

Monitor for service disruptions and security events. 

Third party incidents often start as performance issues. Service instability, missed Service Level Agreements (SLAs), or delayed results usually show up before there is a formal incident notice. 

Monitoring practices should clearly define: 

• Which conditions require review. 

• Who is responsible for follow-up. 

• What triggers incident escalation. 

A practical way to divide responsibilities is: 

• Business owners monitor performance, manage day-to-day third party relationships, and escalate when a disruption appears credible. 

• TPRM checks the third party’s risk tier and criticality, confirms escalation paths and contacts, and sends the issue to the right internal teams based on the third party’s profile. 

• Security, Privacy, Legal, and Continuity teams get involved once the situation is considered an incident, either because the third party declares it or internal teams confirm a possible security, data, or continuity impact. 

Practitioner takeaway: Set a defined point for when an issue escalates to a formal incident, ensuring clear responsibility transfer. 

Align incident response with recovery and continuity planning. 

For third parties that are critical to operations, incident response and recovery planning often overlap. A security problem can quickly turn into an availability or customer-impact issue with little warning.

Organizations are better prepared when they have a shared approach for third party response and recovery. This should include:  

• Notification requirements and evidence expectations. 

• Impact assessment inputs. 

• Decision authority and escalation paths. 

• Recovery time and recovery point assumptions. 

• Workaround and alternate sourcing options. 

Talking through scenarios that include third party outages helps teams understand limits before a real disruption happens. 

Practitioner takeaway: Integrate recovery planning into incident response so that recovery steps are considered as part of overall incident handling, not left until later. 

Address AI-related incident considerations during intake and contracting 

When third parties use AI, it affects data handling, control processes, and regulatory risks during incidents. These issues are hard to solve in the middle of a response. 

Practical preparation includes: 

• Identifying where AI is used and what data it touches. 

• Requiring notice of material changes to AI-enabled workflows. 

• Aligning incident notification and investigation expectations contractually. 

This helps reduce uncertainty when incidents happen. 

Practitioner takeaway: Define incident response expectations for AI usage and data handling with third parties before incidents happen to avoid delays. 

Consider regional and geopolitical disruption in third party recovery planning. 

Regional outages, sanctions, and infrastructure failures often hit third parties before they affect your own operations. 

Preparation should include: 

• Identifying regional concentration across operationally critical third parties. 

• Understanding which services can pause and which cannot. 

• Discussing realistic disruption scenarios with continuity stakeholders. 

• These talks often reveal single points of failure that might otherwise go unnoticed. 

Define ownership and decision authority in advance. 

Third party incidents take longer to resolve when it is unclear who is responsible. TPRM can help speed things up by making the structure clear. 

Programs should ensure: 

• Every third party has a named business owner. 

• Escalation and risk acceptance authority are documented. 

• There is a defined forum for remediation decisions, exceptions, renewals, and exits. 

• Exceptions have owners and review dates. 

Clear authority helps resolve incidents faster. 

Practitioner takeaway: Address structural issues, like unclear ownership and escalation paths, to reduce delays during third party incidents. 

Track incident-relevant measures, not activity volume. 

Leadership oversight gets better when reports focus on risk exposure and follow-up, not just on program activity. 

Measures that tend to support decision-making include: 

• Coverage of current validation for operationally critical third parties. 

• Known material fourth-party exposure for operationally critical third parties. 

• Time to initiate triage for third party incidents. 

• High-risk issues that exceed agreed remediation timelines. 

• Concentration risk across essential services. 

These measures help teams focus on what matters most and escalate issues as needed. 

Practitioner takeaway: Ensure reporting enables clear decision-making by emphasizing risk exposure and remediation status. 

Summary 

Effective incident response and recovery in the extended enterprise rely on preparation that supports coordination, clear ownership, and predictable escalation. TPRM teams add the most value when third party records are ready to use during incidents, response expectations are based on risk and criticality, and recovery planning is part of the response process. Fourth-party involvement should be seen as a normal part of third party delivery, with clear visibility into key dependencies for the most important third parties. 

---

Author Bio

Hilary Jewhurst

Sr. Membership & Education Coordinator at TPRA

Hilary Jewhurst is a seasoned expert in third party risk and risk operations, with nearly two decades of experience across financial services, fintech, and the nonprofit sector. She has built and scaled third party risk programs from the ground up, designed enterprise-wide training initiatives, and developed widely respected content that helps organizations navigate regulatory complexity with clarity and confidence.

Known for turning insight into action, Hilary’s thought leadership and educational work have become go-to resources for professionals looking to mature their TPRM programs. She regularly publishes articles, frameworks, and practical guides that break down complicated risk topics into meaningful, accessible strategies.

Hilary recently joined the Third Party Risk Association (TPRA) as a staff member, supporting industry-wide education, peer learning, and advancing best practices. She is also the founder of TPRM Success, a boutique consultancy that helps organizations strengthen their third party risk management capabilities through targeted training, tools, and strategic guidance.